featured image

The revised FRS 102 standard brings one of the most significant changes to UK revenue accounting in recent years. Effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026, the new requirements introduce a fundamentally different approach to revenue recognition that could affect almost every business.

While some organisations may see little change to the overall value of revenue reported, others could experience significant shifts in the timing and presentation of revenue within their financial statements. That means finance teams cannot afford to leave preparations until the financial year end.

The new approach to revenue reporting

The updated guidance in Section 23 of FRS 102 Revised is based on the principles of IFRS 15 and introduces a five-step model designed to create greater consistency and comparability in financial reporting. 

Rather than focusing solely on when goods are delivered or services are completed, businesses must now consider:

  • The specific promises made to customers (i.e. warranties, additional fees or services etc)
  • The amount of consideration they expect to receive
  • How and when those promises are fulfilled 

For straightforward businesses with simple revenue streams, the impact may be limited. However, businesses operating with complex customer contracts, bundled goods and/or services, variable pricing arrangements or long-term projects may need to rethink how revenue is recognised.

Example:

Imagine you work in a mobile phone shop. In the past, you could simply report the revenue gained from a mobile phone sale. With the FRS 102 Revised changes however, you must consider:

  • The phone model you sold;

  • The monthly data contract you sold as part of the package;

  • The phone warranty;

  • Any add-on accessories you sold as part of the contract

As you can see, the FRS 102 Revised changes add more complexity to revenue reporting. Business owners and finance directors must embed more time in their reporting to accommodate this more detailed level of data for their accounting and that their auditors will expect. 

Understanding the Five-Step Model

At the heart of the revised standard is a structured five-step framework for recognising revenue:

1. Identify the contract with the customer

Businesses must first determine which contractual arrangements fall within the scope of the standard. This includes considering whether separate contracts should be combined and how contract modifications should be treated. 

2. Identify the performance obligations

Organisations must identify the distinct goods or services promised to customers and determine whether they should be accounted for separately. Areas such as warranties, non-refundable upfront fees, customer incentives and principal-versus-agent arrangements require particular attention. 

3. Determine the transaction price

The total value of consideration is not always straightforward. Businesses may need to assess variable consideration, rights of return, refund liabilities, non-cash consideration and financing elements within contracts. 

4. Allocate the transaction price

Where a contract includes multiple performance obligations, revenue must be allocated based on standalone selling prices. Discounts and variable consideration may also need to be apportioned appropriately. 

5. Recognise revenue when obligations are satisfied

Perhaps the most important question is when revenue should be recognised. The revised standard provides detailed guidance on whether performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time or over time, potentially changing the timing of revenue recognition for some businesses. 

Why businesses must act early

Although the first mandatory reporting period may feel some distance away, the work required to assess the impact should not be underestimated. 

Many organisations will need to:

  • Review existing contracts and revenue streams
  • Assess whether current accounting treatments remain appropriate
  • Calculate the impact of any required changes
  • Update management reporting processes
  • Revise budgets, forecasts and financial projections
  • Communicate any changes to key stakeholders

Waiting until the year-end audit process to address these issues could create unnecessary time pressure and result in unexpected adjustments. 

Choosing a transition approach

Businesses will also need to decide how they transition to the revised requirements. FRS 102 Revised offers two options:

Full retrospective adoption involves restating thecomparative figures, providing greater consistency but requiring more historical analysis. 

Modified retrospective adoption applies the changes from the date of transition without restating comparatives, which may reduce the implementation burden for some organisations.

The most suitable option will depend on the needs of stakeholders and users of the financial statements. 

Don't overlook disclosure requirements

The changes extend beyond the recognition of revenue itself. FRS 102 Revised introduces more detailed qualitative and quantitative disclosure requirements, meaning businesses should review both their accounting policies and supporting financial statement disclosures.

Importantly, the impact of the revised standard will be unique to each company, depending on its contractual arrangements, customer relationships and revenue streams. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. 

Final thoughts

The introduction of the revised revenue recognition model represents a significant change for businesses reporting under FRS 102. While some organisations may experience minimal disruption, others could see substantial changes to the timing of revenue recognition, internal processes and financial reporting disclosures. 

The key message is simple: start planning now. By assessing contracts, understanding the five-step model and evaluating transition options well before your accounting year end, businesses can minimise disruption and ensure a smoother transition to the new requirements.

author

Ian Robinson

Ian Robinson is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales with over 30 years of professional experience spanning Big Four, mid‑tier, and specialist firms. Having joined Shorts in 2015, Ian has since progressed into the role of Senior Audit Quality, Technical and Training Lead, overseeing audit quality, shaping the firm’s training strategy, and guiding technical matters for the Corporate Team. Drawing on his experience at PwC, Grant Thornton, and two years working in Australia, as well as his involvement with the ICAEW’s National Technical Advisory Committee and Praxity Alliance networks, Ian plays a key role in supporting Shorts’ continued commitment to excellence in audit quality.

View my articles